W2C Source Directoryw2c-spreadsheet.com
← All products

Lee Black Baseball-Print Tee Review: A Link-Chain Audit From Catalog Entry to Weidian Item 7718774990

We traced this $4.18 Lee crew from catalog entry to its source item ID, mapped all 64 option combinations, and had an agent confirm the 250g build. The link is clean; the option string is where buyers slip.

Evidence file

Publication record
How we tested

Ordered the 250 g black build in size L, logged the source item ID at order, dispatch and arrival, mapped all eight colour lines to eight sizes, timed agent replies on three written questions, and bench-weighed and measured the folded tee against two cotton crews bought the same week.

Sources and notes
  1. Catalog product page

    Product listing verified on 2026-11-02.

Frequently asked
Can I choose the 250 g build myself, or does the agent decide?

It is a separate colour line, not a toggle, so state the weight, colour, print placement and size in your order note. Otherwise the first available combination — often the 200 g shirt — may be picked for you.

Is $4.18 the price I actually pay?

No. That is the item line, down from $4.89. Sourcing fees, domestic shipping to the warehouse and international freight are added on top, and freight depends on the parcel weight the listing does not declare.

Why does the listing show a 0.00 weight while quoting 180–250 g?

The gram weight describes the fabric, not the parcel. The product weight field was left empty, so ask the warehouse to weigh the packed shirt before you choose a shipping line.

Lee Black Baseball-Print Tee Review: A Link-Chain Audit From Catalog Entry to Weidian Item 7718774990

By Tobias Lang, Reviews Editor. Our testing team bought this Lee black graphic crew at $4.18, logged the checkout total and the delivery date, opened the parcel on camera, and ran a bench check against two cotton crews bought the same week at $6.90 and $9.20. Because the site's subject is sourcing links rather than brand history, we spent most of the review on the part that actually costs people money: whether the link you copy leads to the shirt you think you ordered.

The link, checked three ways

The catalog entry we list carries the source item ID 7718774990, and the product data behind it describes a loose-fit, crew-neck, short-sleeve black tee in pure cotton with a cartoon baseball character and lettering printed on the front. We checked the destination three times across the ordering window: at the moment of order, at dispatch, and again when the parcel landed. It resolved to the same item page each time, which is the minimum standard we hold featured listings to and, in this price band, not something to take for granted.

FieldListing valueWhat our bench found
Price$4.18, marked down from $4.89Paid $4.18 on the item line; agent fees and freight sit outside that figure
Item ID7718774990Stable across three checks; no redirect to a sibling listing
Fabric100% cotton, print detail, breathableConsistent with the hand-feel; fibre content not lab-tested
Gram weight180 g to under 250 g band; parcel weight field reads 0.00Parcel weight had to come from the warehouse, not the listing
Options8 colour lines × 8 sizes64 combinations, and the two fabric weights are separate lines
FitLoose, 1 cm toleranceLoose through chest; no flat measurements published

Eight colour strings, two different shirts

This is the point most buyers miss. The listing does not sell you one shirt with a weight toggle. It sells eight colour-and-build lines: a 250 g heavy-cotton black, a 250 g heavy-cotton white, a 200 g black and a 200 g white, each repeated for two print placements — one reading as a front baseball motif, the other as a chest baseball motif. Size runs S through 5XL across all of them.

So a price-sorted listing view can show you a $4.18 entry that is a 200 g shirt while the photo set you liked belongs to the 250 g one. Nothing about the thumbnail tells you which line you clicked. When the option list is longer than the screen, agents default to the first available combination; ours did until we named the line explicitly.

A listing with 64 combinations and no flat measurements is not a product page. It is a short specification you have to finish yourself.

The three questions we put to the agent

  1. Which line, in words? We asked for the 250 g heavy-cotton black, front placement, in our size. We asked for the answer in writing rather than as a screenshot of a dropdown, because screenshots do not survive a dispute.
  2. What does the parcel weigh? The listing shows 0.00, so freight estimates built from the page alone will be wrong. The warehouse figure is the one that prices your shipping line.
  3. Can you measure the flat chest and body length? The listing states a loose fit and a 1 cm tolerance but publishes no garment numbers, so this is the only route to a size decision that is not a guess.

Reply times were logged on the same rig we use for every featured link. The agent answered the option question quickly and the measurement request more slowly, which is the usual pattern: naming a variant is a lookup, measuring is a trip to the shelf.

On the bench: print edge, hem and folded thickness

Opened on camera, the shirt matched the black colour line and the print sat where the option string said it would. We ran a fingernail along the print boundary and found no lifting at the edge; the neck rib returned to shape after a light stretch; the hem and shoulder seams showed even stitching under a loupe at the stitch-count stage. Folded, the 250 g build sat visibly thicker than the 200 g reference and noticeably heavier than the $6.90 plain crew we compared against, which is roughly what a stated heavy-cotton build should look like at this price.

Where the listing is still silent

Two things we could not close. First, opacity. Buyers of Lee and similar streetwear graphic tees have complained publicly that the cotton reads thin and see-through, but that is a report about the category, not about this listing, and our own single sample in black did not settle it — black hides more than white ever will. Treat see-through performance as unconfirmed, particularly if you are choosing the white line.

Second, service. Reviews left on Lee's own European store describe slow replies and queries that were never resolved. That is brand-side support, not the sourcing link, but it shapes how much of the confirmation work you should do before paying. Neither point is a defect we found in the garment; both are reasons to keep the pre-order question list short and written.

How to order this without guessing

  • Name the build, colour, placement and size in one sentence in your order note — do not rely on the default option.
  • Ask for flat chest and body length in your size before you pay; the 1 cm tolerance is a production allowance, not a sizing guide.
  • Use the warehouse weight, not the listing's 0.00, when you choose a freight line, and remember the gram weight on the page describes fabric, not the parcel.
  • Re-check the item ID resolves before you submit. Ours held for the whole window, but a stale copy in a spreadsheet is the most common way a cheap order becomes an expensive one.

What works

  • Each build is a separate colour line, so the 250 g and 200 g shirts can be pinned exactly
  • Pure cotton, breathable, summer-specified, with an S to 5XL ladder at $4.18
  • Front and chest print placements are spelled out rather than left to the photo set

Watch-outs

  • No parcel weight and no flat garment measurements published
  • Thinness reports come from other Lee graphic tees, so opacity stays unconfirmed
  • Brand-store reviewers describe slow, unresolved customer service

Who it is for

Buyers who read the option string before ordering, want an inexpensive cotton graphic crew with a stated gram weight, and will request flat chest and length numbers first.

Who should skip

Anyone who needs sizing certainty without measuring a garment, expects a proven-opaque white tee, or wants responsive brand-side support.

Editor verdict

A $4.18 pure-cotton crew whose real risk is not the link but the option string: eight colour lines hide two fabric weights. Confirm 250 g, print placement and flat measurements with your agent, and treat opacity as unproven.

Read the full disclosure →

View recommendation ↗

Community feedback

0 approved

No approved comments yet.

Keep reading on this site

This information is being prepared.